a previous owner of a Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG who claims that the engine wore prematurely due to problems with the valvetrain.
According to the lawsuit, the engine’s camshafts, made from cast nodular iron, and the associating valve lifters, made from 9310 grade steel, are either not installed properly from the factory, or are not heat treated correctly which causes early wear. The plaintiff
that his now-sold second-hand E 63 suffered engine failure due to considerable wear on the left bank camshaft. The issue was not covered under warranty so he paid US$4594.26 to have the problem fixed.Three months later, the right cylinder bank camshaft suffered the same problem. He then had to sell the car, which put him at a loss of $25,000. All this happened in 2008Mercedes-Benz has been aware of the potential engine problem since 2007, as cited in service bulletin S-B 05.20/20b.Mercedes-Benz is aware of the lawsuit but isn’t allowed to talk about further details prior to the court action.
No comments:
Post a Comment